 |
Deaccessioning and capitalisation in museums from an international perspective
Francesca Imperiale, Marilena Vecco
Cultural Management: Science and Education 1 No. 2 (2017)
https://doi.org/10.30819/cmse.1-2.02 pp: 17-31 2017-12-22
|
Stichworte/keywords: Deaccessioning, public museums, capitalisation, inalienability
Cite: APA BibTeX
Imperiale, F., & Vecco, M. (2017). Deaccessioning and capitalisation in museums from an international perspective. Cultural Management: Science and Education, 1 (2), 17-31. doi:10.30819/cmse.1-2.02
@article{Imperiale_2017,
doi = {10.30819/cmse.1-2.02},
url = {https://doi.org/10.30819/cmse.1-2.02},
year = 2017,
publisher = {Logos Verlag Berlin},
volume = {1},
number = {2},
pages = {17-31},
author = {Francesca Imperiale, Marilena Vecco},
title = {Deaccessioning and capitalisation in museums from an international perspective},
journal = {Cultural Management: Science and Education}
}
Abstract
Deaccessioning and capitalisation are among the most controversial practices in museum management,
and yet they still receive little attention in the extant literature. The debate on these practices is typically
accompanied by polemics, as both practices assume the underlying concept of accounting museum
collections as realisable assets. Reductions in public subsidies and increasing accountability for spending
public funds is putting more pressure on museums to gain a more market-facing orientation. In this context,
both deaccessioning and capitalisation are becoming progressively more attractive as sources for
the improvement of museum collections and organisational performance. This paper has an exploratory
scope. Adopting a comparative approach, we review the state of the art in deaccessioning and capitalisation
regulations of public museum collections in a sample of selected countries (Australia, France, UK
and USA).
Abstract, Vita & References (PDF)